Since when have you been actively involved with orders of chivalry and honours?
I have been working intensively and professionally with orders of chivalry and honours since 2004. But I have always had a keen interest in them.
What is the reason or motivation behind your interest in orders of knighthood and honours?
I lived in Wageningen until I was five, and then in Renkum. If you walked down the Telefoonweg there, you’d find yourself almost immediately at the landing sites of the Battle of Arnhem. And in Wageningen, there were the annual veterans’ events. There were servicemen there wearing magnificent decorations. I even corresponded with a number of them for quite some time.
I also worked as a volunteer at the Airborne Museum for about five or six years. That was great fun. Back then, you were still called upon to do a lot of different tasks, such as restoration work or maintaining cannons. It was also a time when many war veterans were getting on in years and were donating their sets of medals to the museum. That made it very personal: you heard the stories from the people themselves.
In 2004, the Committee on Valour Awards was reactivated. As Head of General Affairs and Protocol, I was appointed to sit on it. I still remember the very first meeting at what was then the Juliana Barracks.
I currently have a dual role: I am a coordinator and adviser on honours policy at the Ministry of Defence (66 per cent) and also chair of the Banners and Standards Committee (33 per cent).
What is your area of interest?
I do not collect honours. But I do have a few. For example, I have the New Guinea Cross awarded to my commander in the marines. These are honours that are dear to me because they remind me of the people who once held them and of what they did. If I had to name my areas of interest, they would be campaign medals and bravery awards. For me, it’s all about the stories behind them: campaign medals are about operational deployment, often under extremely harsh conditions.
Medals for valour are about personal bravery. There is, however, some debate as to whether military personnel should only be eligible for a medal for valour if their actions have influenced the outcome of a
operation. I don’t agree with that. There are countless examples of bravery and tremendous dedication where there was absolutely no influence whatsoever on the course of an operation. But courage is courage! Take, for example, David Lord and John Daniel Baskeyfield, two soldiers who fought in the Battle of Arnhem. Lord dropped supplies for the troops on the ground from his aeroplane, even though his aeroplane was on fire. And Baskeyfield continued to fire at the German troops even though he was seriously wounded. Neither survived their actions and both were posthumously awarded the Victoria Cross. Their actions had no bearing on the outcome of the battle, but they were both incredibly brave.
Do you have any orders of knighthood or honours yourself?
Yes, I am a Knight in the Order of Orange-Nassau and hold the Cross of Honour in the House Order of Orange.
I received the first one for going above and beyond in my work. For example, I organised the MH-17 memorial ceremony and was involved in the coronation ceremony of Willem-Alexander in 2013 – the latter as early as a year in advance, even though the exact date was not known at the time. I also helped organise the 200th-anniversary commemoration of the Army. And I was involved in the reburials of fallen soldiers, for example at the military cemetery in Loenen. For a long time, very little was done in the Netherlands to pay tribute during the reburials of Dutch war dead; fortunately, that has now changed.
I was awarded the Order of the House because I was involved with the Cavalry Honour Guard for 25 years and because I served as an adviser to the King’s Military House for roughly the same length of time. Something I still do, incidentally.
I also have medals from my deployment to Bosnia (the HVO-HIM and NATO medals) and the US Army Commendation Medal. As the years have gone by, I’ve found myself becoming more attached to them. Those were extraordinary times: we suffered two fatalities on our side, and I also witnessed the recovery operation for a Croatian soldier.
What is your favourite decoration and why?
That is the Military Order of William. For various reasons, I consider it a very special order:
- It is the first and oldest order of knighthood in the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
- I find the insignia of the order very beautiful and the underlying symbolism really appeals to me.
- And I find the stories of bravery and dedication truly remarkable.
Which order of knighthood or honour would you yourself like to receive one day?
In light of the above, naturally the Military Order of William. But also the French Legion of Honour. I consider that a very special honour too, though I fear I shall not be eligible for it.
Who do you think deserves a royal honour?
I find it difficult to name a specific person, but I do consider a number of criteria to be important. I am currently in the process of nominating two people, and I have nominated various people in the past as well. In doing so, I have always considered the following criteria to be important:
- As well as merit, of course, I also consider modesty to be very important. People who do their work behind the scenes. Who do not boast about their achievements.
- and dedication. People who keep going where others might give up.
- And finally, quality: people who carry out their work with meticulous care.
Are there any other points you would like to mention or that require attention?
In the Netherlands, the Ministry of the Interior is responsible for the honours system. However, the Ministry of Defence has its own distinct role within it. The nature of the work, the experiences staff undergo and the sacrifices they may be called upon to make are of a completely different order. Recognition and appreciation are key concepts here. But the Ministry of Defence owes it to itself to ensure its honours system is in order. In my experience, matters are often dealt with in a far too bureaucratic manner.
I am involved with the ICDO, the Interim Committee on Bravery Awards, a sort of ‘cold case’ team that takes a fresh, critical look at cases from the past. If cases are not handled properly or are left unresolved, this has a huge impact on those involved. Take, for example, the case of Corporal Slager (posthumously awarded the Bronze Cross for rescuing the wounded in Korea in 1951). Or the Wounded Service Badge. I also served on that committee for 10 years. If matters are left unresolved, that is a debt of honour. I would very much like to help bring about improvements in this area.
We currently apply a 10-year time limit, after which cases become time-barred. This time limit was established because memories become less accurate as time passes, and it becomes more difficult to find witnesses and record their testimonies. However, in my view, it would be better to apply the time limit differently: the recording of testimonies and the like must have taken place within 10 years of the event.
Which Dutch researcher, collector or stakeholder would you like to pass the baton to?
I would like to pass the baton to Johan van Houten. He is a retired commander. His field of work is perhaps somewhat comparable to mine, but whilst I handle the policy side of things, he is the one who investigates the facts.
Name Corstiaan de Haan
Place of birth: Wageningen
Year of birth 1960
Occupation: Civil servant at the Ministry of Defence, having served in the armed forces for 44 years.
Contact address cjch.d.h.01@mindef.nl